Template:Did you know nominations/Dicromantispa moronei
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dicromantispa moronei
[edit]- ... that when the fossil mantidfly Dicromantispa moronei was first described the fossil was part of a private collection?
- Reviewed: Ptilosarcus gurneyi
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC).
Article was created less than a week ago, is long enough, neutral, has citations, and is free of close paraphrasing (assuming good faith on the offline source). The hook is neutral, short enough and cited. The source is offline, so I’m assuming good faith on accuracy. The hook is interesting, but I think its wording should be tweaked to something along the lines of “the mantidfly Dicromantispa moronei was first described from a single specimen in a private collection”. QPQ has been completed. All in all, good to go but I’d seriously consider my suggestion on wording. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
