Template:Did you know nominations/Diana Hacker

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Diana Hacker

(

)

... that according to the Open Syllabus Project, Diana Hacker is the second most-read female author on college campuses after Kate L. Turabian? Source: Time
- ALT1: ... that according to the Open Syllabus Project, Diana Hacker's works appear on more than 25,500 syllabi, ahead of Aristotle? Source: EdSurge
- Reviewed: TBA

Created by Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk). Self-nominated at 06:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I couldn't access the first source but I could access the second. Looks good, the only minor concern I had was the site edsurge.com. It looked like it might not be a reliable source but it is operated by a professional education society (International Society for Technology in Education) and I have heard of them before so I know they're not some fly by night operation. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Given that we just had Template:Did you know nominations/Open Syllabus Project, I'm wondering if this isn't effectively two hooks on the same topic? -- RoySmith (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi @RoySmith: The only reason how I found out about Hacker was after I wrote the Open Syllabus Project page. If you prefer, we can drop the "according to the Open Syllabus Project" attribution since I do not believe the above hooks are highly contested opinions. Thank you, Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: I'd put in for the record that no one stopped me from running Joni Albrecht and Julie Schmit-Albin as separate hooks – I don't think we'd have a policy against something like this, although I would have admittedly preferred a double hook. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)