Template:Did you know nominations/Devonshire White Paper
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Devonshire White Paper
[edit]- ... that the Devonshire White Paper of 1923 affirmed that African interests were paramount over those of settlers in British Kenya?
- ALT1:...that the Devonshire White Paper of 1923 is cited as a reason why British Kenya did not develop into a white minority rule, such as South Africa?
- Comment: Article created in draftspace on August 30th, moved to main on August 31st
Moved to mainspace by MediaKill13 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 14:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4620 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 40.1% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 123 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 140 characters
- ✓ MediaKill13 has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 5 more DYKs.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 17:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Date and length fine. AGF on offline source used for both hooks. QPQ not needed as nom has less than 5 credits. No close paraphrasing as the bot is just picking up the quote. Both hooks are good, i'll leave it to the promoter to decide. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- @The C of E: Are the sources really offline? It's on Google books. MediaKill13 (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
