Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/David P. Weber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of David P. Weber's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC).

David P. Weber

[edit]

Created by Epeefleche (talk). Self nominated at 06:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC).

  • New article is long enough, well sourced, QPQ completed. Hook is short enough, so I am checking for copy/plagerism. Mgrē@sŏn 16:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Because this falls under BLP, the editor may remove Kotz' name before publishing due to unresolved litigation. Mgrē@sŏn 17:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  • After reading the article, it appeared as if Kotz resigned after Weber uncovered Kotz' ethics violations. After reading several of the sources cited, it is clear that Kotz resigned to go back to the private sector about the some time that Weber was hired at SEC. Weber made his claims two months later, in March. Mgrē@sŏn 17:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your excellent edits to the article. I don't think they impact the hook, and think it is fine as-is (litigation was subsequent and is not part of the hook); hopefully you or another editor can approve, plagiarism check included. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
  • The current version of the article and of the hook seem to be up to snuff. The article now accurately reflects the chronology of events according to the sources and the hook seems to reflect the same chronology. I did limited copyvio checking and all seems fine.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)