Template:Did you know nominations/Daniel Wolek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  04:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Wolek

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that fictional character Daniel Wolek on the ABC soap opera One Life to Live was recast to several actors, prompting showrunners to call it "the role from hell?"

• ALT1:... that fictional character Daniel Wolek on the ABC soap opera One Life to Live was played by seven child and adult actors?
• Reviewed: ST3000DM001
• Comment: Moved article from a list, expanded article with references and inline citations. Contextualized the impact the character played in the show.

Created/expanded by FrickFrack (talk). Self-nominated at 05:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3396 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (0.0% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 156 characters
  • ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 116 characters
  • ✓ FrickFrack has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 0 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 05:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• Nominated within seven days of creation, length is good. QPQ done. Low chance of copyvio and no close paraphrasing was found. Both hooks are neutral, interesting, short and cited to reliable sources. I prefer the first hook. MWright96 (talk) 12:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)