Template:Did you know nominations/Crooked Run (Catawissa Creek)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Crooked Run (Catawissa Creek)
[edit]- ... that Crooked Run had the highest wild trout biomass of any tributary of Catawissa Creek observed during a 1997 survey?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Trinity (nuclear test)
- Comment: hook cited to page 28
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 16:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC).
- Comment: The way this is worded seems odd. So, was it the highest again the next year? If not, how is that hook-worthy? Looking over the article there seem to be some other points that might be more "useful", like the class-a watershed and such, but I'm no expert on these terms so I can't really offer a better suggestion. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok do you understand my reticence in using that as the hook? "Someone once said something nice" isn't very hook-ish. But I did find something interesting inside we might be able to use... one section states that the upper reaches are acidified by (what I assume is) acid rain. Yet a later section states it's Class A all the way. Is that still correct, or is this time-dependent? Either way, I think we have a basis for something along the lines of...
- ALT1: ... that in spite of the upper reaches of the Crooked Run being acidic due to acid rain, it's still considered Class A Wild Trout Waters?
- @Maury Markowitz: I'm okay with ALT1. --Jakob (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ok let's do it (any chance of a picture of a trout in the river?)...