Template:Did you know nominations/Cozzi porcelain
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cozzi porcelain
[edit]
Cozzi figure of a dwarf
- ... that the Cozzi porcelain factory of Venice was charged so much for Italian kaolin that imported wares were cheaper? Source:Lanaro, Paola, At the Centre of the Old World: Trade and Manufacturing in Venice and on the Venetian Mainland (1400-1800), 2006, p. 299 on "cheaper", & note 80 there on prices
- ALT1:... that by 1784 the Cozzi porcelain factory of Venice had a stock of 118,000 pieces, mostly old and out of fashion? Source: Lanaro, Paola, At the Centre of the Old World: Trade and Manufacturing in Venice and on the Venetian Mainland (1400-1800), 2006, p. 301
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sharifian Solution
- Comment: (alternative pics available)
Created by Johnbod (talk) and Zigzig20s (talk). Nominated by Johnbod (talk) at 02:43, 20 June 2019 (UTC).
- Prefer ALT2 195.7.32.142 (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Article needs a copy edit, but it's interesting and I'll give it a full review when work has been done. Kingsif (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- @Johnbod: The sheer lack of correct grammar, mostly. Kingsif (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, really. You'd better point to some examples. Johnbod (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I did this edit — as you can see there are still issues where the grammar is so poor I don't know what it's trying to say to correct it. Kingsif (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- None of these changes have anything to do with "grammar", or the DYK criteria. Any further discussion should be on article talk. I must admit that I hadn't anticipated that anyone could get 2/3 of the way through an article on 18th-century porcelain, which had already linked to and mentioned the Republic of Venice, and them declare themselves confused as to whether a further mention of "the republic" meant that or the Republic of Italy (established in 1946), but I suppose it shows you have to be ready for all eventualities. Johnbod (talk) 18:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I did this edit — as you can see there are still issues where the grammar is so poor I don't know what it's trying to say to correct it. Kingsif (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, really. You'd better point to some examples. Johnbod (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: The sheer lack of correct grammar, mostly. Kingsif (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
The number of commas I moved sure were grammar, but you're right, there was a lot of poor syntax, too. Be prepared for people who perhaps click on the link from DYK and don't know about the history of Italy! Enjoy working on it, it is interesting, you can ping me when tags addressed or reply here :) Kingsif (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
*
Looks good. No copyvio. Hooks cited, but alt0 seems basic, so I prefer alt1. Kingsif (talk) 13:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)