Template:Did you know nominations/Courts of Ontario
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Courts of Ontario
- ... that, according to William Renwick Riddell, 1837 was an "annus mirabilis" for Ontario's court system? Source: Banks, Margaret A. (1983). "The Evolution of the Ontario Courts 1788–1981". In Flaherty, David H. (ed.). Essays in the History of Canadian Law. Vol. 2. University of Toronto Press. p. 511. doi:10.3138/9781442662919-012. ISBN 978-1-4426-6291-9. JSTOR 10.3138/j.ctt13x1q47.
- ALT1:... that Gladue courts, part of Ontario's court system, apply distinctive principles when sentencing Indigenous offenders? Source: Maurutto, Paula; Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2016-12-20). "Aboriginal Knowledges in Specialized Courts: Emerging Practices in Gladue Courts". Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue canadienne droit et société. 31 (3): 451–471. doi:10.1017/cls.2016.35. ISSN 0829-3201. S2CID 151316248. ("These courts adjudicate bail, conduct trials, and sentence offenders, but they do so by integrating specialized Aboriginal knowledge to produce alternative understandings of an Aboriginal accused so that bail orders and sentences conform to the intent of the R. v. Gladue decision. To ensure adherence to Gladue principles, the court is presented with information that locates an Aboriginal defendant’s behaviour within collective histories and experiences of oppression.")
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lismore Crozier
- Comment: I wish I could link to an easily accessible copy of the Banks source, but besides this Google Books copy, there's not much better I can do. Despite the length of this article, there aren't that many hook-y facts in it, so I welcome alt suggestions.
Moved to mainspace by AleatoryPonderings (talk). Self-nominated at 16:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC).
- This substantial and well-written article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either of the proposed hooks could be used, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)