The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Overall: This is well written with comprehensive references, the sort of article we should have more of. With a cite on the source sentence for the hook it'll be fine in every respect. Nice work! One question: could "deforming" be linked? – to the layman it's not too clear what that means. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
@Justlettersandnumbers: Huh. Thanks for the appreciation! I've added another cite (really a repeat of the end of paragraph cite but with a pagenumber this time) and pipelinked the "deforming" to bradyseism.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
This is well written with comprehensive references, the sort of article we should have more of. With a cite on the source sentence for the hook it'll be fine in every respect. Nice work! One question: could "deforming" be linked? – to the layman it's not too clear what that means. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. This is now ready to go. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)