Template:Did you know nominations/Content audit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 10:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Content audit

(

)

... that a content audit, a qualitative analysis of all or part of a website, can help an organization develop its content strategy?

Created by Cirrus Editor (talk). Self nominated at 22:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC).

Now at AFD. Yoninah (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

AFD closed as keep. The page creator has agreed to improve the refs based on the discussion on the AFD page. Yoninah (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I added several new refs to the most popular books on the topic, where appropriate, and also did some editing for better sense. I've left in the blog posts from experts in the field because they add value to the article overall and act as an instant guide to what a content audit is (ie, folks can simply click through to the article to read on the topic and see examples of content audit tools and practices). Thanks to Yoninah for guidance here. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Cirrus Editor, for improving the refs for this article. I'm sorry for putting you through the hassle of AFD; now I see I should have simply listed the referencing problems on the DYK page and asked you to fix them if you wanted to go through with the nomination.
Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)