Template:Did you know nominations/Conjugal dictatorship

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
WP:OR issues

conjugal dictatorship

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Ferdinand and his wife

• ...that author who coined the phrase conjugal dictatorship, which described Ferdinand Marcos and his wife (both pictured), disappeared and his son was later found dead?

Created by Imeldific (talk). Self-nominated at 12:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC).

• Interesting article which is long enough for DYK with 1592 ch. Posted by due date. Hook is interesting, cited and verified. No copy vio noted. Text is neutral. QPQ is not done. Pl confirm if you have less than 5 DYKs to your credit so that I can give a green tick.Nvvchar. 01:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

• Nvvchar,, I only have 1 DYK. Imeldific (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

• In view of above, the article is GTG.Nvvchar. 02:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you very much Nvvchar. May I ask one more little favor? Can this appear on April 9 Day of Valor in the Philippines. Ferdinand Marcos claims to be a World War II veteran so this is good. Imeldific (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

• This article appears to be OR, and I have tagged it as such. None of the sources actually discuss the term "conjugal dictatorship"; it is just mentioned in passing in each piece. The page creator appears to be familiar with the term and has cobbled together different sources that mention it to build an article, which is considered OR and SYNTH. The first paragraph has numerous unsourced statements. Saying that the term originated from a book and then using the book as a reference for that statement is unacceptable; it does not prove that this was the first use of the term. I removed the cites from the last sentence because they did not verify the information in the sentence. Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

• In view of above about which I was not very clear, I with draw my approval of the hook.Nvvchar. 01:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)