Template:Did you know nominations/Common parsley frog

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Regrettably, the nominator has not addressed the issues, including insufficient expansion and referencing, and the article has since picked up a copyedit tag, meaning a significant edit for prose quality is also needed. Closing as unsuccessful.

Common parsley frog

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Image of P. punctatus perched in a damp environment

• ... that common parsley frogs are able to breed in both the autumn and spring seasons, and can choose one or both breeding seasons based on when it is most advantageous for them? Sources:

  Jourdan-Pineau, Helene; David, Patrice; Crochet, Pierre-Andre (February 2012). "Phenotypic plasticity allows the Mediterranean parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus to exploit two temporal niches under continuous gene flow: PLASTIC BREEDING PHENOLOGY OF P. PUNCTATUSMolecular Ecology. 21 (4): 876–886. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05420.x.

  Salvidio, Sebastiano; Lamagni, Luca; Bombi, Pierluigi; Bologna, Marco A. (2004-07-01). "Distribution, ecology and conservation of the parsley frog (Pelodytes punctatus) in Italy (Amphibia, Pelodytidae)". Italian Journal of Zoology. 71 (sup002): 73–81. doi:10.1080/11250003.2004.9525564. ISSN 1125-0003.

  • Reviewed:

5x expanded by Gracedekoker (talk). Self-nominated at 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC).

•  Reviewing... Howard the Duck (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• General eligibility:
• New enough:
• Long enough: - n
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - n
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: A QPQ is not needed. The sources in the article are fine, but there is quite a bit of unreferenced content. It doesn't seem to have been 5x expanded within 7 days of the nomination. SL93 (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

The nominator hasn't edited since October 21st. They are currently taking a WikiEd course that runs until December, but unless they return or a 5x expansion is accomplished, there is no path forward for this nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)