Template:Did you know nominations/Commission Directive 91/71/EEC

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fram (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Commission Directive 91/71/EEC

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that contrary to popular belief, the EU did not attempt to ban prawn cocktail crisps?

• Reviewed: Janeway Lambda one

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 08:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

• • ✓ This article is new and was created on 07:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2053 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 23.7% confidence. (confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

• • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 81 characters
  • ✓ The C of E has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Janeway Lambda one was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

• I think that's a hook which will get plenty of clicks from both sides of the Brexit argument. It certainly would have got mine! Article is newly created, meets size requirement and is fully cited, including cites to the hook fact. Copy violation checks come up clear. I took the liberty of fixing part of the nomination template, so hopefully that should all work fine now. Miyagawa (talk) 16:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)