The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Overall: AGF on offline book source. Everything checks out, though I did have to make some formatting changes. SounderBruce 04:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
I removed this from the prep area per a discussion on the DYK talk page. SL93 (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Here is the discussion:
The hook fact lacks an inline cite. Also, the hook goes beyond what the article says, which is: The Newport News section was lightly used—usually not filling a single coach. Yoninah (talk) 11:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Indeed; that usually is essential. ——SerialNumber54129 16:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
The inline cite was at the end of the next sentence, but I have duplicated it at the end of the sentence used by the hook. Would ALT1: "...that the Colonial replaced a train that usuallyoften could not fill a single passenger car?" be an appropriate hook? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes, but I think the word "often" reads more smoothly here. Thanks for the inline cite; I couldn't check it myself because it's offline. Restoring tick for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 11:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
AGF on offline book source. Everything checks out, though I did have to make some formatting changes. SounderBruce 04:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
