Template:Did you know nominations/Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868

(

)

... that according to the art-historical analysis Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868 the 9th century manuscript was copied from the model dated to the 3rd century?

Reviewed: Ratirahasya

Created/expanded by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 02:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

ALT1, for English: ... that according to art-historical analysis the 9th century manuscript Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868 was copied from a 3rd century model? Johnbod (talk) 02:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

ALT2:... that according to art-historical analysis the 9th century illuminated manuscript Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868 (pictured) was copied from a 3rd century model?

Prose size, picture license, hook size and reference, references and creation date OK. About the hook, I would prefer ALT2 => (ALT1 + link), what do you think about it? Good to go! Alex2006 (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)