Template:Did you know nominations/Cochecton–Damascus Bridge
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cochecton–Damascus Bridge
[edit]
- ... that a lawsuit over the construction of the Cochecton–Damascus Bridge (pictured) between New York and Pennsylvania led to a ruling that sovereign immunity did not extend to the states' joint bridge commission?
- ALT1:... that for most of the 19th century, the Cochecton–Damascus Bridge (current structure, pictured) was the only one for 30 miles (48 km) in either direction across the Delaware River between New York and Pennsylvania?
- Reviewed: Preoperative care
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 04:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC).
@Daniel Case: New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. I can't seem to find the fact that the case was a precedent in the source for the original hook (perhaps I'm missing something?) and can't verify ALT1 at all. --Jakob (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Jakec: I have reworded the hook to address your concern. As for ALT1, how do you mean you can't verify it? You can't get to the source because you don't have Java enabled, or you can't find it in the source? Please clarify. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
I'd go with the original hook in its current wording. I wasn't able to find ALT1 in the source. --Jakob (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's on page 12 of the Damascus Historic District NRHP nomination, near the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- That isn't the source that's given in the article. Anyway, I'd still lean towards the original hook, since that's more interesting. --Jakob (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fine. I'll adjust the footnotes nonetheless. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- That isn't the source that's given in the article. Anyway, I'd still lean towards the original hook, since that's more interesting. --Jakob (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's on page 12 of the Damascus Historic District NRHP nomination, near the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Jakec: I have reworded the hook to address your concern. As for ALT1, how do you mean you can't verify it? You can't get to the source because you don't have Java enabled, or you can't find it in the source? Please clarify. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Done Now, if the promoter wants to use either hook, they can. Daniel Case (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)