Template:Did you know nominations/Cliona californiana
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cliona californiana
[edit]- ... that the yellow boring sponge inhabits the shells of living scallops and oysters?
- Reviewed: Lutetium-hafnium dating
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC).
- @Cwmhiraeth: long enough, recently 5x expanded enough, every non-lede paragraph cited, nothing questionable on Earwig, neutral. I think I would be happier if there was an in-line referenced sentence explicitly saying they live in the shells of scallops and oysters in particular. I also wonder if it might be better to clarify in the hook it's only young sponges which do this? QPQ is done, the only minor thing holding me back is just making sure the hook's information appears cited in the article. Hook is backed up by references, so I imagine this is an easy fix.
Umimmak (talk) 03:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Umimmak: I have added an extra reference. I don't think the hook needs to specify young individuals because all the sources mention that it lives inside shells and only one mentioned the possibility of it being free-living at a later stage, and that would not be likely to happen on any host that moved around, like a scallop. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks! That makes sense.
Umimmak (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks! That makes sense.
- @Umimmak: I have added an extra reference. I don't think the hook needs to specify young individuals because all the sources mention that it lives inside shells and only one mentioned the possibility of it being free-living at a later stage, and that would not be likely to happen on any host that moved around, like a scallop. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: long enough, recently 5x expanded enough, every non-lede paragraph cited, nothing questionable on Earwig, neutral. I think I would be happier if there was an in-line referenced sentence explicitly saying they live in the shells of scallops and oysters in particular. I also wonder if it might be better to clarify in the hook it's only young sponges which do this? QPQ is done, the only minor thing holding me back is just making sure the hook's information appears cited in the article. Hook is backed up by references, so I imagine this is an easy fix.
