Template:Did you know nominations/Clark Street station
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 21:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Clark Street station
- ... that the only entrance to the New York City Subway's Clark Street station is through a hotel? Source: "Linking of Subways in Brooklyn Soon to Abolish Shuttle Nuisance". The Standard Union. March 13, 1919.
- ALT1: ... that in the 1920s, a guard was posted outside the New York City Subway's Clark Street station to prevent sailors from using it at night? Source: "Plunkett Forbids Gobs At Clark Street Station". The New York Herald, New York Tribune. November 13, 1924. p. 3.
- ALT2: ... that in the 1920s, sailors were banned from the New York City Subway's Clark Street station at night? Source: "Plunkett Forbids Gobs At Clark Street Station". The New York Herald, New York Tribune. November 13, 1924. p. 3.
- ALT3: ... that stolen tiles and miscommunication caused a renovation of the New York City Subway's Clark Street station to be delayed? Source: Levine, Richard (May 11, 1987). "Updating 50 Subway Stations: Costly and Late". The New York Times, Finder, Alan (March 16, 1992). "Transit Authority Switches Tracks". The New York Times
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Abortion in Taiwan
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk) and Kew Gardens 613 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 15:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Clark Street station; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Date (GA) is fine, a lot of stuff AGF-ed per GA review, so focusing on hooks. The main hook I feel is (sorry for being blunt) mundane and not very interestng. Ditto for ALT3. As such, I'd prefer ALT1 or 2, with preference to 1, since I am not sure if "ban" is the correct terminology. So in the end - review pass for ALT1. All that remains is the QPQ. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Piotrus. I have done a QPQ. No worries about being blunt, by the way; I proposed multiple hooks because what may intrigue some readers may not interest others. Epicgenius (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- now :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Piotrus. I have done a QPQ. No worries about being blunt, by the way; I proposed multiple hooks because what may intrigue some readers may not interest others. Epicgenius (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)