Template:Did you know nominations/Clara Emilia Smitt

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Clara Emilia Smitt

(

)

Clara Emilia Smitt

~~... that doctor Clara Emilia Smitt (pictured) was one of Sweden's earliest women's rights activists, and wrote articles on the subject for the magazine Idun?~~

ALT1... that Swedish doctor Clara Emilia Smitt (pictured) ran the sanatorium in Saltsjöbaden between 1896 and 1902?

Reviewed: Khmer language

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self-nominated at 22:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC).

This article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral and the image is in the public domain. The hooks are both cited inline but the sources are in Swedish so I was unable to consider copyright issues. I did some copyediting of the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: could you please provide an inline cite for the ALT0 hook fact? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

@Yoninah: I have found the best inline citations that I could. Let me know what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 11:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Thanks for the cites for her writing articles for Idun. What about a source verifying that she was "one of Sweden's earliest women's rights activists"? Yoninah (talk) 13:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

@Yoninah: I found a source for a book about Feminism in the 1800s in Sweden. I talked to a friend that had read it and he verified that Clara is mentioned in it. That is the best I can do. BabbaQ (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Then, sight unseen by you, the page creator, I think we should stick with ALT1. Restoring tick for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I think that is for the best. I will look further for better sourcing for that sentence we mentioned.BabbaQ (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)