Template:Did you know nominations/Clallam County Courthouse
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Clallam County Courthouse
[edit]
- ... the clock of the Clallam County Courthouse were warehoused at the Seattle docks for 29 years?
- ALT1:... the clock/bell tower of the Clallam County Courthouse is featured on the seal of Clallam County?
5x expanded by Carl Henderson (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
Before expansion, the article had 412 characters (73 words) "readable prose size", meaning that a 5x expansion is 2060 characters of readable prose size. The article is now at 1958 characters (323 words) "readable prose size", so it needs 102 characters to be eligible. Alt1 isn't even mentioned in the article! As for the hook, the source indicates that it was only the clock that was warehoused for 29 years (not the clock and bell): "To start, the clock is much older than its house. Built in 1880...it was shipped around the horn to Seattle, but no buyer waited there to claim it, Jones said. So the clock sat on the dock for 29 years, until courthouse architect Francis Grant found it — and sold it to Clallam County for $5,115. When the courthouse was completed...the builders connected a 4-foot-tall, 2,000-pound bell to the clock." Otherwise, the article is in good shape (referenced, no copyvios) and this appears to be the nominator's first DYK nominee (no results from QPQ check tool), so the lack of a QPQ is not a problem. The article just needs a little expansion and the hook needs to be corrected to pass. AHeneen (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I've addressed your suggestions as follows: 1) I've slightly expanded the article (I was able to find a few more interesting bits of information to add in), 2) I clarified that the bell wasn't what sat on the docks for 29 years, and 3) added a sentence about Alt1 (the clock/bell tower on the county seal). I hope this new version passes muster! Carl Henderson (talk) 23:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oh—and this is actually my second DYK nomination. I will start reviewing as required by QPQ after I learn the process and requirements a bit better. Carl Henderson (talk) 23:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
