Template:Did you know nominations/Ciprofol
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ciprofol
... that ciprofol may be useful as a cerebral protective agent in the setting of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury?Source: Wang, Y. C.; Wu, M. J.; Zhou, S. L.; Li, Z. H. (2023). "Protective effects of combined treatment with ciprofol and mild therapeutic hypothermia during cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury". World Journal of Clinical Cases. 11 (3): 487–492. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i3.487. PMC 9923870. PMID 36793629.
Created by DiverDave (talk). Self-nominated at 17:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ciprofol; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Can a better hook be proposed here? The current hook is very technical and would likely not be understood by non-specialists. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- How about ALT1
... that pain on injection and respiratory depression are less common with ciprofol than with propofol?DiverDave (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)- I'm honestly not sure if that's much better. In addition, I don't know but I think the current wording might be taken as medical advice, which is generally a no-no. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done. I propose ALT2: ... that ciprofol has also been used for sedation of critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit?--Launchballer 18:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not sure if that's much better. In addition, I don't know but I think the current wording might be taken as medical advice, which is generally a no-no. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- How about ALT1
New reviewer will be needed to check ALT2, proposed by previous reviewer. Striking original hook and ALT1 due to issues raised. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
new hookchecks out, and is less technical. All GTG. Johnbod (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
