Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Church of St Paul, Liverpool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Church of St Paul, Liverpool's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Ashwin147 (talk) 07:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC).

Church of St Paul, Liverpool

[edit]

Church of St Paul, Liverpool, from the southwest

5x expanded by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nominated at 18:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Everything else checks out (hook, inline citations, RS sources, free image), but DYKcheck says article has not been expanded 5x. Could you look into this? NinaGreen (talk) 02:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • By my own (admittedly simple) calculation, it was increased from 306 to 2,544 characters of readable text. That seems to me well over the necessary 5x, but maybe my sums are wrong. Help please! --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Version before expansion is only 268 characters, and the version after is 2521 – easily satisfies expansion requirements. I'm not sure why DYKcheck does not detect it, but that's an issue with the tool. It seems everything else is fine per NinaGreen's review, so this should be good to go. Chamal TC 17:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for checking that, Chamal, and for giving the article a tick. NinaGreen (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)