Template:Did you know nominations/Christine Hakim

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Christine Hakim, Cinta Pertama

( Back to T:TDYK • Article history )

... that Teguh Karya had to fight for Christine Hakim's right to act in First Love after his producer said her breasts were too small?

Reviewed: ~~Ratón~~ E.R. Shipp, Eden II
Comment: I count 24.3x expansion.

5x expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 14:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: The review of Ratón was already used for a prior submission (Teguh Karya). Need a fresh QPQ for each new nom. Cbl62 (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. Here we go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that Christine Hakim's 38 year acting career started after she was unable to say "no" to Teguh Karya regarding a role in First Love?

ALT2: ... that actress Christine Hakim, star of First Love, compared the FIAPF award to Viagra?

Note: I've turned this to a double nom. Cinta Pertama is new, Christine Hakim is expanded. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

I've checked the Christine Hakim article. New expansion confirmed, appropriately referenced. I've done spot checks for copyvios and close paraphrasing and didn't have any concerns. The article is pretty good work! Note that I haven't looked at the other article covering the film. Schwede 66 19:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

This is just to ensure the hook isn't promoted prematurely. Still needs a review for Cinta Pertama (1973 film) Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Cinta Pertama (1973 film): passes on newness and on length (even with the plot section not counted), referencing adequate with the exception of the unreferenced plot and I believe this is an established acceptable exception. (I did have to switch the dates on two of the refs, heh.) I checked several refs and found no copyvio or overly close paraphrasing. Article prose acceptable. Hook fact appears in the article and is referenced; however, the source says "producer" in the singular. I think that's a good hook and see no reason not to go with it, but the conflict regarding how many producers is the reason for the question mark. Is there another source that says the film had more than one producer or was that just a slip-up? Yngvadottir (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook and article fixed. Oops. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

And that gets it the other tick. Using the AGF one because I really can't read Bahasa Indonesia :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Any preferences for ALTs? Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)