Template:Did you know nominations/China Folk House Retreat
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
China Folk House Retreat
- ... that the China Folk House Retreat dismantled a Chinese folk house and rebuilt it in West Virginia? Source: Wu, Daniel (2022-07-08). "A Chinese farmhouse in West Virginia bridges politics and a pandemic". Washington Post.
- Reviewed: I have only 1 approved dyk.
Created by Interaccoonale (talk). Self-nominated at 08:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- Article is currently tagged for notability concerns; this needs to be resolved before it is ready for DYK.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
The notability tag needs to be resolved, but everything else looks good. Interesting article – now I want to go to Harpers Ferry so I can see the house. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mx. Granger. I didn't noticed the tag. How could I resolve it? Should I discuss it with the reviewer?——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 16:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you can discuss it on the article talk page, or just add additional independent reliable sources to the article to make notability clearer. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Interaccoonale: Pinging to make sure you've seen this response. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, I've been busy in real life and I'll resolve the concerns as soon as possible. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 06:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your waiting. This article has been re-reviewed by another reviewer. The notability concerns has been resolved.——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 01:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Looks good to me. I've made a couple of copyedits. I recall that past discussions have considered CGTN generally unreliable as a source, but I see in this case it's being used for an uncontroversial claim that's also supported by a more reliable source. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, although I don't understand why it is considered unreliable, I think it's a good idea to keep it. Because the other source is written in Chinese. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talk・contribs) 13:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
