Template:Did you know nominations/China Disabled Persons' Federation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
China Disabled Persons' Federation
[edit]( )
- ... that the logo of the China Disabled Persons' Federation is based on a plum flower?
Created/expanded by NNUJ05TennyWang05090502 (talk), NNUJ05BerryBu05090501 (talk), NNUJ05BambiWang05090503 (talk), and NNUJ05DevonoSima05090504 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 00:19, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- According to this tool the article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days (34 days) Redyka94 (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- The article only went live on 13th April. Prior to that it was in project space, someone created something in article space by mistake earlier. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't know. But, all the references are bare URLs, could you fix it? Redyka94 (talk) 06:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- no problems, I have clothed the bare url's in templates by your request, but are you sure that is a requirement for DYK's? You cannot expect new editors to know how to do it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm new at DYK, so I read this. In Review the article(s) section, point 4.4, it is stated "References may not have bare URLs such as [1] or http://example.com". Sorry if I misunderstood that statement. Because English is not my native language. Redyka94 (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- I had better get that text changed, as the DYK is getting tougher than GA. Anyway that is a side issue to the nomination. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- There is another problem. In the articles 7 paragraphs are not cited. If this problem fixed, I think the article is eligible for DYK. For the hook: I think it's interesting enough, there isn't any problem. Redyka94 (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- The citations were following. I have put reference name on those paragraphs missing a ref now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)