Template:Did you know nominations/Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Cinematography

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Cinematography

(

)

... that in 2004, the Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Cinematography resulted in a tie?

ALT1:... that Dean Semler was the first recipient of the Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Cinematography for his work on Dances with Wolves?
Reviewed: USNS Lewis B. Puller (T-MLP-3/T-AFSB-1)
Comment: Please feel free to tweak the blurb.

Moved to mainspace by JuneGloom07 (talk). Self nominated at 01:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC).

Article contains only 1218 characters of content outside the list, which is short of the 1500 required for DYK noms. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 01:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh, shoot. I forgot to check. I'll see what I can do to expand the prose. - JuneGloom Talk 02:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

I have expanded the lead some more and I think it now contains more than 1500 characters of content. - JuneGloom Talk 01:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Length is now 1623 chars of prose. Date/NPOV is fine and the sources check out. The alt hook is definitely verified and I'm AGF on the first one which is cited to a paywalled page that does not include the information in question in the freely available portion of the article, but the article is clearly about the 2004 awards. I prefer the first hook as it is kind of unusual for there to be a tie in an award like this, but either is fine. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 19:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

I have removed this from the prep area, as although the lead generally doesn't have to be referenced I think it would be appropriate in this case. Given that this is a standalone list, the prose presented into the lead is not necessarily repeated later in the article, and I therefore feel that inline citations: at least in the first paragraph. Harrias ^talk 23:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

I have added some sources to the lead, including one for the hook which is not behind a paywall. - JuneGloom Talk 22:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Any progress here? Time for re-review, please? --PFHLai (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Sources were added to article lede. Article size passes. Both hooks are sourced and meet character length. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)