Template:Did you know nominations/Chelsea Waterside Park

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 19:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Chelsea Waterside Park

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Chelsea Waterside Park

• ... that a playground at Chelsea Waterside Park (pictured) contains a pipefish tower and mussel houses? Source: Several, e.g. Rock, Michael (August 15, 2018). "Chelsea Waterside Park Play Area is Back in the Business of Fun; Chelsea Waterside Park Play Area is Open Again". Chelsea Now. pp. 1, 6−7, 10
  • ALT1: ... that a playground at Chelsea Waterside Park (pictured) has two limestone cattle heads? Source: Margolies, Jane (June 20, 2018). "From the Slaughterhouse to the Playground". The New York Times.
  • ALT2: ... that the original design for Chelsea Waterside Park's (pictured) water playground was criticized because local residents thought the sprinklers resembled sex toys? Source: Papacosma, Kathryn (August 27, 2001). "Wet 'n' Wild in Chelsea". The New York Observer.
  • ALT3: ... that Chelsea Waterside Park (pictured) contains a pipefish tower, mussel houses, limestone cattle heads, and benches adapted from an arch? Source: Multiple in article; see above.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Louise Franklin‎
  • Comment: Tdorante10 created the article; I merely nominated it.

Created by Tdorante10 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 16:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Chelsea Waterside Park; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• The article is new enough, long enough, referenced, neutral and no copyvio obvious. The hooks are sourced and interesting. QPQ done. No issue with the image here or others in the article. Corachow (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)