Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Biasiny-Rivera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kimikel talk 13:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Charles Biasiny-Rivera

Created by Thriley (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 143 past nominations.

Thriley (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC).

  • I'll go ahead and review this, but it's my first review so I hope I do it right! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 15:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: Yes
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: No - My one concern would be that the article sentence about driving the Volkswagen around the neighborhoods is a close paraphrase of the source sentence. I'm not sure how big of an issue it is or how else it could be worded though, so I'll defer to what someone with more experience than me says.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Would appreciate someone else taking a look as this is my first DYK review. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 15:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  •  Reviewing... Flibirigit (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
    • Citations should be formatted with templates available from Wikipedia:Citation templates. Only one of the four citations has full details such as title, author, publisher, location, access-date, et cetera. Including Template:Infobox person would be helpful and highly recommended, but not mandatory. I've done a bit of copyediting for links and style, and the close paraphrasing. Otherwise, the original review seems correct to me. I defer back to the original reviewer @Darth Stabro: for approval of the nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
      • The citations in the article have been properly formatted so it's a go from me now! ~Darth StabroTalkContribs 00:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)