Template:Did you know nominations/Chandavaram Buddhist site
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by sst✈ 07:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Promoted using hook provided by FourViolas
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chandavaram Buddhist site
[edit]- ... that Chandavaram Buddhist site is a 2000-year-old Buddhist site in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh?
Created by AKS.9955 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC).
- Article was nominated quickly enough (sorry for the delay in review), is long enough, has been copyedited. No copyvios; as usual, some sentences are hard to recast, but none were copied. The sources are used well, but some flirt with unreliability, and I think the information from the holidayiq article should be cited to other sources or dropped. Hook is neutral, interesting and cited to an RS, although an alternate along the lines of "...that a lotus medallion and a 9-foot-long pillar depicting the Buddha as fire have been stolen from the Chandavaram Buddhist site?" might be more gripping. QPQ not required.
FourViolas (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Article was nominated quickly enough (sorry for the delay in review), is long enough, has been copyedited. No copyvios; as usual, some sentences are hard to recast, but none were copied. The sources are used well, but some flirt with unreliability, and I think the information from the holidayiq article should be cited to other sources or dropped. Hook is neutral, interesting and cited to an RS, although an alternate along the lines of "...that a lotus medallion and a 9-foot-long pillar depicting the Buddha as fire have been stolen from the Chandavaram Buddhist site?" might be more gripping. QPQ not required.
