Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux

[edit]

Created by Chumash11 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC).

  • Article was expanded 5x. It is neutral and cites sources inline. Following issues need to be addressed: 1) In the infobox under "Site History" the reference #1 for "In use" does not support 1947-1967,2) There is no mention of “"Elevation" as "491 m" under "Airfield information" in the infobox, 3) Establishment of the site "on April 24, 1947" is given by ref #3 and not by ref #2, 4) "CIEES remained in use until June 1, 1967" is not supported by ref #2 nor #3, 5) The entire text under "List of directors of CIEES" lacks citation, 6) The number of total launches as "230" does not adds up in ref #8. No noteworthy similarities are reported by "Earwig's Copyvio Detector". The hook (I prefer the original one) is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. Its fact is referenced offline, for which I AGF. QPQ is not done. Possibly, the nominator has less than five DYN's. I will approve after all six a.m. issues are addressed. CeeGee 08:42, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I've addressed the issues you brought up. Please take a look at the article and let me know if you have any further concerns. And I have less than five DYN's. Thank you for reviewing my submission! Chumash11 (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Everything is fine now. Good to go. CeeGee 06:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Looking to promote this, I find the proposed hooks are not supported by the article. I would like to suggest ALT2.
  • New reviewer needed to check ALT2. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Chumash11: Not sure if all the bolding in the History section is necessary. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. I changed the bolding to italics and further referenced the hook. The book I cited can be found on Google Books here (the fact that Felicette is the only cat to have successfully traveled to space is on p.228). I also added a video (in French, unfortunately) of a 1963 broadcast from the French national public broadcaster about Felicette mentioning her launch from CIEES. With these new references, I would vote for the original hook, or "ALT3" below:
ALT3... that the only cat to successfully travel into space, Félicette, was launched from the Centre interarmées d'essais d'engins spéciaux? Source:Burgess, Colin; Chris Dubbs. Animals in Space: From Research Rockets to the Space Shuttle p.228
  • ALT3 should be good to go then: verified inline in an offline source (so AGF), and is interesting and mentioned in the source. Also seems to address the issues raised above. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)