Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Cecil Abercrombie and John Skinner Wilson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Cecil Abercrombie, John Skinner Wilson (rugby union)

[edit]

5x expanded by FunkyCanute (talk). Self-nominated at 16:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC).

  • @FunkyCanute: - I will do the review now. But since there are two articles you will need two QPQ reviews. I will review for the other criteria so you can sort the other QPQ.  MPJ-US  18:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Cecil Abercrombie

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Expanded from 952 k of "reable prose" to 5225 Kb as of May 2 so it meets the expansion requirement. I don't like that references 9 through 15 are just bare url references if the article is getting displayed on the main page. It will only take 2 minutes to add the appropriate data.  MPJ-US  18:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

John Skinner Wilson (rugby union)

General eligibility:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Expanded from 433 K of "reable prose" to 2694 K, satisfying the expansion requirement. Again I see 3 bare url references, if we put this on the main page it'd be great if they had the appropriate info added to them  MPJ-US  18:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Just the second QPQ and adding data to the bare bones reference and this would be good to go.  MPJ-US  18:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

MPJ-DK Thanks for the review: I've now filled the bare references, and done the second QPQ. FunkyCanute (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC) (FunkyCanute This checks out now.  MPJ-US  00:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not sure why the review template still lists problems, but the last check is the one that is counted and we're good to go. MPJ-US  00:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)