Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Rex
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Maile (talk) 23:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Captain Rex
[edit]- ... that Captain Rex was created for the Star Wars: The Clone Wars film and its television series because George Lucas felt the previously chosen character's name created too much alliteration in the cast?
- ALT1:
... that clone trooper Captain Rex of the Star Wars: The Clone Wars film and related television series shares a name with the droid pilot of Star Tours? - Reviewed: Family (Star Trek: The Next Generation)
- Comment: I created the article from redirect this afternoon, but before it was a redirect, there was an article existing at the title before the subject could support an article (the series and film were only a year old at the time). Here's a link to old revision immediately before redirection. The Shubinator script will call the article out and skip over that the article existed as a redirect from February 2009 until yesterday.
- ALT1:
Converted from a redirect by TenTonParasol (talk). Self-nominated at 19:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 17:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 10472 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 21.9% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 190 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 144 characters
- ✓ TenTonParasol has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 2 more DYKs.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Created from a redirect. However, the original page, before it was blanked and converted to a redirect on February 24, 2009, contained 7863 characters of text. Even though this article is much better written and sourced, it is not a 5x expansion and unfortunately does not qualify per Rule A4. Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Ah, I didn't realize the rule wrt redirects was that. (And it still seems to me that the rules are... vague, is there a way to make that more clear? Or, am I just dense.) I didn't think anything of it because the bot didn't flag it as an error, but then again, like it says, no substitute for human review. (Pft, go for it after a GA nom, it is. That is possible, correct? A renomination after a failed one, that is?) At any rate, but what is the rationale for striking the alt hook? I'm just curious about that one, and so I don't attempt to resuggest the hook if a second run here is possible. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 23:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- @TenTonParasol: yes, a GA is a great idea; you're most of the way there! The bot is a new experimental thing that was just instituted, and we're finding that it doesn't always cover all the bases as a human review would do. I struck the ALT1 hook because 1) I liked the first hook better (I tweaked it, adding "name"), and 2) it is not in keeping in with another DYK rule, Rule C6. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
