Template:Did you know nominations/Cam McCormick
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 16:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Cam McCormick
- ... that Cam McCormick is thought to be the first college football player to be granted a ninth year of NCAA eligibility? Source: AP, South Florida Sun-Sentinel
- ALT1: ... that when Cam McCormick scored a touchdown against Eastern Washington in 2022—his first touchdown since 2017—he donned the same jersey number as that of his late friend and teammate, Spencer Webb? Source: The Register-Guard, The Oregonian
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ad fructus uberes
- Comment: QPQ to kome. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- QPQ posted above. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Created by Red-tailed hawk (talk). Self-nominated at 05:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Cam McCormick; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A very well done article on an interesting athlete! I had actually wondered recently what the record was for most college football seasons; now you've answered it for me! Either hook works; the second one I found interesting because I actually wrote Webb's article. Looks good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- We equivocate with " thought to be" in ALT0 and maybe that is ok. The "first" hooks get scrutiny. Bruxton (talk) 15:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11 and Red-tailed hawk: Found what I think is WP:CLOP in the personal life section. Please take a look and ping me when you have. Bruxton (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: More or less that entire section (aside from the estrangement part) was added by a new user (an IP from Bend, Oregon and wentleft) after BeanieFan had reviewed. I noted some concerns about it in article talk, though I have to fix the article. There were some image copyright issues that I had fixed after the user’s edits, but I had missed the CLOP aspect.I’ve no objection to removing the second paragraph in its entirety pending a rewrite—which would need to be fairly substantial given the sourcing and CLOP. Alternatively, I can try to re-write it in the AM tomorrow (UTC). Please let me know which you’d prefer. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 16:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11 and Red-tailed hawk: Thank you for the note, please address it and then ping me and I will promote. I like ALT0 and have a spot for it. Bruxton (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: I’ve removed the offending paragraph. I’ll try to re-write it at some point before I go for GAN, but I think that the omission of the content is fine at DYK. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 16:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11 and Red-tailed hawk: Thank you for the note, please address it and then ping me and I will promote. I like ALT0 and have a spot for it. Bruxton (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: More or less that entire section (aside from the estrangement part) was added by a new user (an IP from Bend, Oregon and wentleft) after BeanieFan had reviewed. I noted some concerns about it in article talk, though I have to fix the article. There were some image copyright issues that I had fixed after the user’s edits, but I had missed the CLOP aspect.I’ve no objection to removing the second paragraph in its entirety pending a rewrite—which would need to be fairly substantial given the sourcing and CLOP. Alternatively, I can try to re-write it in the AM tomorrow (UTC). Please let me know which you’d prefer. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 16:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11 and Red-tailed hawk: Found what I think is WP:CLOP in the personal life section. Please take a look and ping me when you have. Bruxton (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)