Template:Did you know nominations/Burgos trials
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Burgos trials
- ... that a series of military tribunals awarded six controversial death penalties to members of ETA (logo pictured) in December 1970? Source: The military court granted six death sentences .... Under domestic pressure and demands from the Vatican and the international community [...] Franco commuted all death sentences to thirty years in prison. Muro (2013) 105
- ALT1:
... that the harsh verdict of the 1970 Burgos trials sparked interventions from Pope Paul VI and Jean-Paul Sartre?Source: A Vatican spokesman disclosed tonight that Pope Paul VI had made personal appeal to General Franco urging that the lives of the six condemned Basques be spared. The spokesman, Federico Alessandrini, said the Vatican had “noted with particular sat isfaction” that General Franco's decision to commute the death sentences “answers an appeal to the Spanish Head of State by the Holy Father.” [1] and "large sectors of international public opinion led by Jean-Paul Sartre looked to ETA as the vanguard of anti-Francoist resistance." Muro (2013) 106
- ALT1:
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Serious Sam's Bogus Detour
- Comment: The coming month has several occasions on which this would be a good fit: 3 December (start of the trials), 9 December (end of the hearings), 28 December (day of the verdict) and even 30 December (day of the commutation).
Created by Modussiccandi (talk). Self-nominated at 12:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article: - Inadmissible, although the logo is used in the article it's not sufficiently related to the topic, which is the trials rather than the organization.
- Clear at 100px:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: It's a bit weird to give the location but not the publisher for books. Stating the publisher makes it much easier to determine if the book is a reliable source. I think ALT0 is hookier. Image not approved. (t · c) buidhe 08:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)