Template:Did you know nominations/Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.
[edit]- ...That analytical dissection could be used for substantial similarity of expression of user interfaces and analytical dissection could be used to separate protectable forms of expression from the unprotectable ones.
Created by Anthonysutardja (talk). Nominated by Ashwin.d.chandak (talk) at 18:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC).
This nomination does not conform to the DYK rules. The hook does not contain the article title, and it was moved to mainspace on 28 October 2013, which is too long ago. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
