Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Briscan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Briscan

[edit]
[[File:|133x150px|A 'marriage'; one of the bonuses in Briscan ]]
A 'marriage'; one of the bonuses in Briscan
  • ... that the historical card game of Briscan has been described as a "Gothic extravaganza" of "almost hysterical excitement and complication", squeezing "a truly phenomenal range of scores and melds" from just a 32-card pack? Source: "...Briscan, or Brisque, a related game of almost hysterical excitement and complication. This Gothic extravaganza squeezed a truly phenomenal range of scores and melds from the deal of five each from the 32-card pack" - Parlett, David (1990). A History of Card Games, OUP, Oxford. ISBN 0-19-282905-X, p. 286.

Created by Bermicourt (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC).

General eligibility:

  • New enough: Yes
  • Long enough: Yes
  • Other problems: No - I am concerned by how much of the prose consists of outlining the rules of the game, but as there is no mention of this in the guidelines I am saying "yes".
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Needs to complete QPQ. I'm also not sure a picture truly adds to the DYK, though if one is needed on the day it goes out, the one this article has is not a bad choice. -- NoCOBOL 14:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Thanks @NoCOBOL:. I've done the QPQ. I've also condensed the rules on melds and bonuses into a table and slightly expanded the history section to balance the article up. Bermicourt (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Looks good, approved. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)