Template:Did you know nominations/Breaching experiment
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Breaching experiment
[edit]... that a breaching experiment involves the violation of commonly accepted social rules or norms as well as noting other people's often bewildered reactions?
5x expanded by Ioanaschmidt (talk). Self nom at 03:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Article expanded >5x 17-19 Nov. Properly cited. Interesting hook, justified in article. Hook is a little long but within the rules. Happy if anyone can think of a shorter hook ("as well as" perhaps not ideal) but it's good to go. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that a breaching experiment involves studying other people's reactions to the violation of taken-for-granted social rules?
- Changed hook. Ioanaschmidt Talk 21:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that a breaching experiment involves studying other people's reactions to the violation of basic social rules?
- maybe a bit less hyphenated.... :o} Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I think that's a better option for the hook. Thanks for your suggestions! So is it good to go?
Ioanaschmidt Talk 13:34, 3 Devember 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.179.60.93 (talk)
I'm happy with that, good to go. Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
