Template:Did you know nominations/Bradley v. The Commonwealth

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Bradley v. The Commonwealth

(

)

... that the Australian case of Bradley v Commonwealth held it was unlawful to unilaterally cut off telephones to a Rhodesian information office? Source: Sydney Morning Herald (newspapers.com)

Reviewed: Kenneth John

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 09:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

To T:DYK/P6