The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
... that the Bayard–Condict Building became a U.S. National Historic Landmark despite its owners' claim that the building was "run-down" and "undistinguished"? Source: Hays, Laurie (January 25, 1987). "Feisty preservationist rescues historic buildings". St. Petersburg Times. p. 1H.
ALT2: ... that the Bayard–Condict Building, the only New York City building designed by Louis Sullivan, was once described by its owners as "undistinguished"? Source: Hays, Laurie (January 25, 1987). "Feisty preservationist rescues historic buildings". St. Petersburg Times. p. 1H.
ALT3: ... that the owners of the Bayard–Condict Building, the only New York City building designed by Louis Sullivan, did not want it to be a New York City landmark? Source: Posner, Ellen (February 19, 1985). "Louis Sullivan's Low-Profile Skyscraper". The Wall Street Journal. p. 1.
ALT4: ... that the Bayard–Condict Building was surreptitiously nominated as a U.S. National Historic Landmark because its owners opposed landmark status? Source: Hays, Laurie (January 25, 1987). "Feisty preservationist rescues historic buildings". St. Petersburg Times. p. 1H.
ALT5: ... that angels are perched atop the Bayard–Condict Building? Source: Posner, Ellen (February 19, 1985). "Louis Sullivan's Low-Profile Skyscraper". The Wall Street Journal. p. 1.
QPQ: - pending Overall: @Epicgenius: Good to go after QPQ done. I will note that Earwig's flags a high percentage, but it is just long building names and properly attributed quotes, so all is well. Assuming good faith on the offline hooks, I would reccomdend using either ALT0 or ALT4 as I find those the most interesting. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
@Schminnte: Thanks for the review, and sorry for keeping you waiting so long. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- pending
@Epicgenius: Good to go after QPQ done. I will note that Earwig's flags a high percentage, but it is just long building names and properly attributed quotes, so all is well. Assuming good faith on the offline hooks, I would reccomdend using either ALT0 or ALT4 as I find those the most interesting. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
