Template:Did you know nominations/Battlefield Archaeology
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Article not eligible for 5x expansion (hadn't been expanded at all until the past week, and is barely 2x even now), and nomination never transcluded. Closing as unsuccessful.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Battlefield Archaeology
- Did you know that the rich history of battlefields also has a play in Archaeology? Source: "Battlefield archaeology is not concerned, primarily, with the causes of conflict but of the sites where conflict actually took place, and of the archaeology of the event." (Sutherland, T.L. (2005) Pg. 7)
- ALT1:This section of archaeology focuses on the battlefield and conflict, not the reason for the conflict. Source: "The discipline, therefore, applies the approaches and techniques of archaeology to military and civil conflict." (Schofield et al. (2002) Pg. 2)
Created/expanded by Decerex (talk). Self-nominated at 13:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC).
Sorry,Decerex, but it's not eligible. There have been no edits to Battlefield archaeology since early June 2019, and it hasn't been designated a Good Article. (Also, the hooks are not properly formatted, and the nomination hasn't been transcluded.) Please see WP:DYK for more information. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
