Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Luang Namtha
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Battle of Luang Namtha
[edit]- ... that Royal Lao Army troops fled 160 km (99 mi) after their defeat at the Battle of Luang Namtha?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ahmed Taymour
- Comment: When the Royal Lao Army lost the Battle of Luang Namtha against half their number of enemy soldiers in 1962, it fled south in disarray. Some of the deserters did not stop until they had crossed into neighboring Thailand. It was a disastrous but all too typical performance by the fledgling Lao army, beginning 13 years of bloody futility.
Created by Georgejdorner (talk). Self nominated at 22:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - n
- Interesting:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hook is not cited. Otherwise, I'm approving AGF on the sources, which I cannot access. --¿3family6 contribs 22:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- As memory serves, I found the original 160 km figure via Google maps. Searching my sources, I found a text reading 150 km. I substituted that in, and added the needed cite. And not to worry. I always write with the sources in my hands.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- All set. I knew that the hook was supported, but per DYK guidelines it needs to be directly cited.--¿3family6 contribs 18:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- No prob. Please excuse oversight.Georgejdorner (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- All set. I knew that the hook was supported, but per DYK guidelines it needs to be directly cited.--¿3family6 contribs 18:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)