Template:Did you know nominations/Barbara Hohn

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Article too short; issues unaddressed.

Barbara Hohn

(

)

... that Austrian molecular biologist Barbara Hohn is particularly known for her research into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens?

Created by Edwardx (talk). Self nominated at 23:01, 19 October 2013 (UTC).

New, no copyvio found via tool, QPQ still needed (editor has >5 DYKs), but the prose isn't long enough (gen2)—it has to be 1,500 characters to qualify for DYK. czar ♔ 19:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Long enough now. Edwardx (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/John Black Atkins reviewed for QPQ. Edwardx (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Not sure if the review can continue since the article was ineligible. Length is good now, but as it stands, the hook is not reflected in the article (and has no immediate ref—see 3b). It also has unsourced personal statements. czar ♔ 03:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Czar, we typically allow articles that come in shorter than the requirement to be expanded once this is pointed out. However, I've just removed redundant and out-of-date material from the article, which is now down to 1357 prose characters, too short for DYK. (And I probably should have removed the Austrian name of the prize she won, which would shorten it further; the English is sufficient.) The "particularly known for her" is not supported by an inline source; the footnote after the sentence in "Career" about her doing the research would seem to support that this was a subject she researched (I haven't actually looked at myself to check). BlueMoonset (talk) 21:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: re: length—sounds good czar ♔ 21:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Nom hasn't responded in several weeks and article is still too short czar ♔ 01:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)