Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Banality (sculpture series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Banality (sculpture series)

[edit]

Created/expanded by Violetriga (talk). Self nom at 18:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

  • (currently for all but ALT1). Length checks out (7157 characters); article was created on November 6, 2011; the referencing appears pretty good, but on closer inspection, I can't find an inline reference for the ALT1, ALT3 isn't even mentioned in the article (while it states they were copyright infringements, it doesn't say that they were from photographs.) It is also unclear what reference covers the infoboxes for the sculptures. Harrias talk 15:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Please be more specific about the ALT1 problem - I've added a reference to further the "topless" part if that is what you are referring to. ALT3 is mentioned in the article in the individual sculpture sections. I've added references for the infoboxes but it's not an ideal solution. violet/riga [talk] 18:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Okay, with ALT3, it was just the original wording of the hook that threw me off, the current layout is much cleared and referenced appropriately. I'll check the rest after my dinner! Harrias talk 19:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
With regards to ALT1: "partly clothed" is a much looser term than "topless"; if you wish to use the latter in the DYK, I'd suggest using the same in the article. However, the rest of my concerns have been met. Spotchecks reveal no copyvio or close paraphrasing. With the exception of ALT1, the hooks are all good to go. Harrias talk 19:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
A fair point - article clarified. violet/riga [talk] 19:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
And thanks for the speedy responses. violet/riga [talk] 19:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
No problem, approved for all hooks now. Harrias talk 20:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)