Template:Did you know nominations/Balfour Declaration
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Cowlibob (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Balfour Declaration
[edit]
Balfour Declaration
- ... that the term "national home" in the Balfour Declaration is considered to have been intentionally ambiguous?
Improved to Good Article status by Oncenawhile (talk). Self-nominated at 09:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC).
Long and new enough (promoted to GA-class on April 16, 2016, diff), QPQ review performed, copyvio checks reveal no problems (e.g. [1]), with matches for properly quoted content in the article, hook content is backed with an inline citation to a reliable source in the article. The only minor matter is that the first paragraph in the World War I section does not have an inline citation (see D2 of the Supplementary guidelines). North America1000 03:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Northamerica1000: thank you for your review. I have now added a cite for that paragraph. Oncenawhile (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Good to go.
Not good to go at all. The article has been featured as a bold linked article "On This Day" a number of times and is ineligible for DYK. Bcp67 (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)- Per the OnThisDay template on the talk page and links in it, Bcp67 is correct. North America1000 22:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
