Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/B. B. Moeur Activity Building

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 10:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

B. B. Moeur Activity Building

[edit]

The main north entrance to the B. B. Moeur Activity Building

Created by Raymie (talk). Self nominated at 03:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC).

  • Age, length, and QPQ check out. Except for several paragraphs missing inline citations, the article seems to conform to policy. Is this the largest WPA building in Arizona, or just one of the largest? The article says both, in each case citing inline a document that does not seem to exist online, as the National Register has not yet digitized it. Have you seen the document? If so, when? Four years ago, when the access is dated? Lagrange613 01:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I mislinked it. Some 80s NRHP noms out of Arizona are entirely put as "photos" and were produced on typewriters but others aren't. I've fixed the link. Raymie (tc) 02:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
There it is! Thanks. Three easy things: (1) Unless I'm missing something, the source says it's the largest adobe WPA-built structure in Arizona. I think that could be clearer in the article, and the hook needs to be changed to reflect it. (2) Please address the paragraphs without inline citations. (3) I think you mean for the access dates in the citations to be 2014, not 2010. Lagrange613 02:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for not answering promptly, I've been slightly busy. I've fixed the access dates. Also, there's a new ALT1 hook to be recommended as a result. I added some additional citations to the nomination and also one for the Mars facility. Raymie (tc) 19:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Almost there. The article still never comes out and states the hook fact; it needs to. Also, the new detail about Governor Moeur's role in writing the state constitution is specific enough that I'd like to see a source cited. Lagrange613 21:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Done. Sorry for the delays on my end. Raymie (tc) 19:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Good to go. Lagrange613 22:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Which hook is getting the green tick? Please strike out the one that isn't approved. — Maile (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Done. Sorry about that. Lagrange613 05:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)