Template:Did you know nominations/Aydın Archaeological Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 17:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aydın Archaeological Museum
[edit]- ... that a burial urn on display in Aydın Archaeological Museum depicts destiny's god Moirai, the god of the underworld Hades, the judges of the underworld, and Hades' three-headed guard dog Cerberus?
- Reviewed: Levant Quartet
5x expanded by CeeGee (talk). Self-nominated at 11:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC).
Meets all criteria required for DYK. Cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 01:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Please list review details, as a courtesy to the nominator, especially if meant to be used as a QPQ. Please don't leave room for this being pulled from promotion because of inadequate review. This article is sourced in the Turkish language (did you check for copyvio/close paraphrasing?) and is structured like a list. If this is a list, and it can be argued that it is, the prose count would be affected. What did you check? — Maile (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)- All of it. Good to go! LavaBaron (talk) 08:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
New reviewer needed. Please provide details of what was checked.DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 6 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.
Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide — Maile (talk) 12:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- As per administrator ruling here, it's been determined no further review is needed. This is cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- There was no such administrator ruling or determination; reinstating Maile's request for a new reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- A discussion in DYK Talk has failed consensus that the review is unacceptable; I don't want to engage in vote-counting but, to make things concise, I'll note 4 editors have proferred the belief it is acceptable, 4 have objected, and 2 have unclear opinions. For lack of a consensus to overturn the review, it is clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)