Template:Did you know nominations/Ay mamá

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Ay mamá

(

)

Mark Zuckerberg in 2019

... that a giant breast destroying a spaceship Mark Zuckerberg (pictured) in the music video for "Ay mamá" is criticism of Meta's censorship of female nipples?

A c.1701–1715 Tarot of Marseilles Empress card

ALT1: ... that the cover art and music video for "Ay mamá" show a tarot card (pictured) that represents feminine power?
ALT2: ... that following the success of "Ay mamá", singer-songwriter Rigoberta Bandini became the first woman to be the most-watched musician on YouTube in Spain?
ALT3: ... that "Ay mamá" and "Terra" losing Benidorm Fest to "SloMo" caused four Spanish government ministers to demand to see the voting results?
ALT4: ... that Rigoberta Bandini wrote "Ay mamá" as a tribute to her mother, but only released it years later after becoming a mother herself?

Liberty Leading the People, Eugène Delacroix, 1830

ALT5: ... that the lyrics of "Ay mamá" were inspired by Eugène Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People (pictured), calling on women to go topless?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hope Runs High
- Comment: The proposed hooks are in no order of preference, though I would like it to get an image slot because there's some great options! Also, I'm still working on expanding the article, but since it's now hit 5x expanded, nominating it while I remember.

5x expanded by Kingsif (talk). Self-nominated at 04:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC).

@Kingsif: I will see if I can take up this nomination for evaluation. I do not see individual sources per DYK mentioned in DYK nomination, that would have helped quicker evaluation. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 07:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Since you mention it, I actually deliberately do not include sources in DYK noms; it encourages laziness/forgetfulness in checking that sources are accessible in the article and that the article text, source text, and hook fact, all agree (I noticed myself forgetting to do so in my own reviewing, which is when I started almost-always not-including sources.) Quicker, sure, but not a proper review of where/how the source is used in the article, i.e. passes WP:V. Sorry for the ramble, thanks again for taking this up. Kingsif (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Review:

QPQ ; Interesting:; Cited:; Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:; Neutral:; Adequate sourcing:; Long Enough:; New Enough:
Overall good for DYK.
Personally I would prefer first or the last i.e fifth hook, for the DYK
Images do not seem to have any copyright issues; Un til I did not read Bandini's interview I was not sure about relevance of 'Mark Zuckerberg's image in the hook since I was not aware how far Zuckerberg is personally linked to FB's related rules. But being head of the institution which has free speech issues, and FB issue seems important enough in the song. So let us give that go ahead.
I checked one ref with help of google translate seemed okay and refs reasonably seem to support hooks. One ref in the article seem to have word blog in it would need a crosscheck by some one.
Article seem to have been expanded 3 times in bytes so likely to have expanded as expected in number of words too. I do not have requisite script for word count, if some one can help on that count might help.

Overall good for DYK.

Cheers, Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 07:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!
I think the source you're describing as ref in the article seem to have word blog in it is Wiwibloggs, which is the premiere source for Eurovision reporting. For my philosophy thoughts on this, the "no blog" rule gets taken way more broadly than it is intended, in general (many legitimate, editorial, outlets either are blogs or run them as side columns), and now seems to be having people question anything that just has 'blog' in it, too. Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
@Kingsif: for ALT0, where does it say in the article that the giant breast destroying the Zuckerberg spaceship (six words i never really thought i'd have to type) was specifically intended as criticism?

@Theleekycauldron: The last sentence of the fourth paragraph of the music video section: The inclusion of the ~~Meta~~ Zuckerberg ship, which also resembles the Imperial Star Destroyer from Star Wars, being destroyed by a giant breast is a condemnation of the company's social networks censoring female nipples. - ~~yeah, since the spaceship has been described already in the article, it says "Meta ship" rather than explain it all again.~~ It also says "condemnation" instead of "criticism"... I might have recently changed that but I think in context the meaning works. Kingsif (talk) 16:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I've made an edit for clarity re this. Kingsif (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
gotcha, thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)