Template:Did you know nominations/Availability heuristic

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Length

Availability heuristic

(

)

... that the availability heuristic can have an influence on the judge and the jury during sentencing?

Created/expanded by Lmauri1 (talk). Self nom at 16:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Newness and length do not check out. Size on 9 February: 3147 B (505 words) "readable prose size". Size on 14 April: Prose size (text only): 6045 B (925 words) "readable prose size". This is not close to five fold expansion. It isn't even TWO fold expansion. Article needs about 2,525 words to be eligible based on five fold criteria. Article is also not completely supported by inline citations. I've put some fact tags in to make this easier to spot. (Once these were addressed, then other issues like WP:NPOV could be looked at. --LauraHale (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Too short. Fails. --LauraHale (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)