Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Ashchorjyo Prodeep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 02:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Ashchorjyo Prodeep

[edit]

5x expanded by Sohambanerjee1998 (talk), . Nominated by Sohambanerjee1998 (talk) at 13:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC).

Since no DYK reviewer is reviewing it I am going to provide the points needed for a DYK nom, I am not I repeat not self-reviewing this but simply providing the points on which DYK is chosen so that the reviewer does not fails it when I am gone for a wiki-break. Sohambanerjee1998 11:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Expansion → 5x needed, done close-to-11x.
Prose size → 3651 B (620 words) "readable prose size"
New → Expansion on 3 November 2013, nominated on the same date.
Hook Size → 163 characters excluding (logo pictured).
Other → I have not yet made 5 DYK Noms, one other was on request of an editor but it was supplied with a QPQ.
Image → Image is not a free use.
Hook Cited → by REF #14

There you go I have provided the points for a DYK reviewer (desperately awaiting one) to review it, which I think they are avoiding because of unfamiliarity with the subject. Sohambanerjee1998 11:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Did some c/e. Length, date and hook reference (ref 14) are in order. No copy vio. Img is not free. GTG.--Nvvchar. 07:35, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Nvvchar the image is not a fair-use as asked by DYK criteria and therefore qualifies in my opinion. Sohambanerjee1998 07:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I am not sure about the img. I will leave it to the Admn to take a view.--Nvvchar. 16:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing it. I can go happily for a Wiki-break now. Sohambanerjee1998 16:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
  • No need to be desperately waiting for a reviewer, I have waited far longer than this for a review before, and nominations are not deleted without review! Image is at FFD now, and in any case DYK explicitly requires all hook images to be correctly licenced. Promoted without image. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 02:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)