Template:Did you know nominations/Asch Conformity Experiments

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Length

Asch conformity experiments

(

)

... that in the present day, Asch conformity experiments continue to be conducted?

Created/expanded by Yvasquez (talk). Self nom at 03:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

This is only about a x3 expansion. Articles have to be expanded by a factor of x5 to qualify for DYK. Gatoclass (talk) 11:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. If I were to add more content within the next few days to reach x5 expansion, would my article still be considered for DYK?

So long as the content was legitimate and not "padding", yes. I added the "delete" icon because I assumed you would not be able to add that much more legitimate content, but if you think you can, there is nothing to stop you trying. Gatoclass (talk) 04:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply! I will be adding more content (that is not "padding") within the next few days.

The original size of the article prior to expansion was 4452 prose characters, so a 5x expansion will require the article to have 22260 prose characters. After yesterday's changes, it has 16832, so another 5428 prose characters are still needed. Note: please be sure to sign and date your posts (use ~~~~); the last two replies have not had them. Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 07:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear BlueMoonset (talk) and Gatoclass (talk), thank you so much for your help throughout this process. I know I am shy of 5428 prose characters but I was wondering whether you could take into account the article prior to my major edits? I nearly deleted all of the content of the prior article. The prior article did not use primary sources and was somewhat unclear. I greatly appreciate the time you are taking out of your day to review my article! YVasquez (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2012 (PST)